Brazilian Journal of Pain
https://brjp.org.br/article/doi/10.5935/2595-0118.20220032-en
Brazilian Journal of Pain
Artigo Original

Exercise-based and pain education program for adults with chronic low back pain in Brazilian Primary Care: feasibility study

Programa de exercícios físicos e educação em dor para adultos com dor lombar crônica na Atenção Primária brasileira: estudo de viabilidade

Ana Ellen do Nascimento Santos; Catharina Saraiva Nobre Cacau; Ana Carla Lima Nunes; Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20220032-en BrJP, vol.5, n2, p.127-136, 2022
PDF English
PDF Português
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 519

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in Brazil. Most of the evidence on interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) comes from high income countries. The objective was to investigate the feasibility of conducting a program based in exercise and pain education in Primary Health Care supported by low-cost mobile technology for adults with CLBP (versus waiting list) and to explore the profile of patients who adhered compared to those who did not adhere.

METHODS: This is a feasibility study with adult residents of Fortaleza, Brazil with CLBP. The Intervention Group consisted of strategies such as physical exercises, pain education, phone calls and support messages to participants. The Control Group was based on a waiting list. Primary outcomes included retention and adherence rates, comprehension of the intervention, credibility, and satisfaction with the intervention. Secondary outcomes included clinical and demographic factors such as pain intensity, disability, recovery prognosis, and physical activity, described according to adherence behavior.

RESULTS: Forty-five individuals were allocated to the Intervention Group and 24 to the Control Group. Overall, 57.8% of participants adhered to the intervention. Retention rates were 53.33% and 58.3% for intervention and control, respectively. The other primary feasibility outcomes were satisfactory. Longer time spent sitting and level of schooling differed the profile of those who adhered to the intervention from those who did not. Higher pain intensity and poorer recovery prognosis, measured at baseline, influenced non-adherence to home exercises.

CONCLUSION: The feasibility of the protocol was adequate for the comprehension of the components, however, adherence to the protocol and the follow-up of the participants were low. The profile of individuals adhering to the intervention includes higher schooling and more time spent sitting at baseline. Characteristics such as higher pain intensity and the influence of psychosocial factors influenced non-adherence to home exercises. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC RBR-5wqr2j).

Keywords

Low back pain, Primary Health Care, Treatment adherence and compliance

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor lombar é a principal causa de incapacidade no Brasil. A maior parte da evidência sobre intervenções para dor lombar crônica (DLC) advém de países desenvolvidos. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a viabilidade de conduzir um programa baseado em exercícios e educação em dor na Atenção Primária à Saúde para adultos com DLC (versus lista de espera) e explorar o perfil dos pacientes que aderiram comparado aos que não aderiram à intervenção.

MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo de viabilidade. Foram incluídos adultos com DLC e residentes em Fortaleza, CE, no Brasil. O Grupo Intervenção foi composto por estratégias como exercícios físicos, educação em dor, ligações telefônicas e mensagens de suporte aos participantes. O Grupo Controle consistiu em lista de espera. Os desfechos primários incluíram taxas de retenção e adesão, entendimento da intervenção, credibilidade e satisfação com a intervenção. Os desfechos secundários incluíram fatores clínicos e demográficos, como intensidade de dor, incapacidade, prognóstico de recuperação e atividade física, descritos segundo comportamento de adesão.

RESULTADOS: Quarenta e cinco indivíduos foram alocados para o Grupo Intervenção e 24 para o Grupo Controle. Em geral, 57,8% dos participantes aderiram à intervenção. As taxas de retenção foram 53,33% e 58,3% para intervenção e controle, respectivamente. Os demais desfechos primários de viabilidade foram satisfatórios. Maior tempo sentado e o grau de instrução diferiam o perfil dos aderentes dos não aderentes à intervenção. Maior intensidade de dor e pior prognóstico de recuperação, mensurados na avaliação, influenciaram a não adesão aos exercícios domiciliares.

CONCLUSÃO: A viabilidade do protocolo apresentou-se adequada para entendimento dos componentes. Entretanto, a adesão ao protocolo e o seguimento dos participantes foram baixos. O perfil dos indivíduos aderentes à intervenção incluiu maior instrução e mais tempo sentado na sua avaliação inicial. Características como maior intensidade de dor e influência de fatores psicossociais influenciaram a não adesão aos exercícios domiciliares. Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (REBEC RBR-5wqr2j).

Palavras-chave

Atenção Primária à Saúde, Cooperação e adesão ao tratamento, Dor lombar

Referências

Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356-67.

Nascimento PRC, Costa LOP. Prevalência da dor lombar no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(6):1141-56.

Marinho F, de Azeredo Passos VM, Carvalho Malta D, Barboza França E, Abreu DMX, Araújo VEM. Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990-2016: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10149):760-75.

Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075-94.

Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368-83.

de Oliveira RF, Costa LOP, Nascimento LP, Rissato LL. Directed vertebral manipulation is not better than generic vertebral manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2020;66(3):174-9.

de Oliveira RF, Liebano RE, Costa Lda C, Rissato LL, Costa LO. Immediate effects of region-specific and non-region-specific spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013;93(6):748-56.

Added MA, Costa LO, de Freitas DG, Fukuda TY, Monteiro RL, Salomão EC. Kinesio taping does not provide additional benefits in patients with chronic low back pain who receive exercise and manual therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2016;46(7):506-13.

França FR, Burke TN, Caffaro RR, Ramos LA, Marques AP. Effects of muscular stretching and segmental stabilization on functional disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(4):279-85.

Franca FR, Burke TN, Hanada ES, Marques AP. Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain - a comparative study. Clinics. 2010;65(10):1013-7.

Magalhães MO, Comachio J, Ferreira PH, Pappas E, Marques AP. Effectiveness of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: midterm follow up results of a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(1):82-91.

Garcia AN, Costa Lda C, da Silva TM, Gondo FL, Cyrillo FN, Costa RA. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013;93(6):729-47.

Miyamoto GC, Costa LO, Galvanin T, Cabral CM. Efficacy of the addition of modified Pilates exercises to a minimal intervention in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013;93(3):310-20.

Magalhães MO, Muzi LH, Comachio J, Burke TN, Renovato França FJ, Vidal Ramos LA. The short-term effects of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2015;20(4):603-9.

Ramos LAV, Callegari B, França FJR, Magalhães MO, Burke TN, Carvalho e Silva APMC. Comparison between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and stabilization exercises in fatigue and transversus abdominis activation in patients with lumbar disk herniation: a randomized study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(4):323-31.

Guimarães LS, Costa LDCM, Araujo AC, Nascimento DP, Medeiros FC, Avanzi MA. Photobiomodulation therapy is not better than placebo in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2021;162(6):1612-20.

Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021:CD009790.

Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo R, Guzman J. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.

Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action [Internet]. 2003.

Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15(3):220-8.

Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239.

Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.

Nijs J, Paul van Wilgen C, Van Oosterwijck J, van Ittersum M, Meeus M. How to explain central sensitization to patients with “unexplained” chronic musculoskeletal pain: practice guidelines. Man Ther. 2011;16(5):413-8.

Gatchel RJ, Rollings KH. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with cognitive behavioral therapy. Spine J. 2008;8(1):40-4.

Du S, Hu L, Dong J, Xu G, Chen X, Jin S. Self-management program for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):37-49.

Macedo LG, Smeets RJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley JH. Graded activity and graded exposure for persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010;90(6):860-79.

Hayden JA, Wilson MN, Stewart S, Cartwright JL, Smith AO, Riley RD. Exercise treatment effect modifiers in persistent low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 3514 participants from 27 randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2019;54(21):1277-8.

Fritsch CG, Ferreira PH, Prior JL, McLachlan AJ, Ferreira ML. Effects of using text message interventions for the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Pain. 2020;161(11):2462-75.

Borg G. Escalas de Borg para dor e esforço percebido. 2000.

Sharma S, Jensen MP, Moseley GL, Abbott JH. Pain education for patients with non-specific low back pain in Nepal: protocol of a feasibility randomised clinical trial (PEN-LBP Trial). BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022423.

Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(11):1331-4.

Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, Goldenberg J. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire - Brazil Roland-Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001;34(2):203-10.

Salvetti MG, Pimenta CAM. Validação da Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale para a língua portuguesa. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2005;32(4):202-10.

Siqueira FB, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Magalhães LC. Análise das propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da escala tampa de cinesiofobia. Acta Ortop Bras. 2007;15(1):19-24.

Matsudo S, Araújo T, Marsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Braggion G. Questionário internacional de atividade física (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2001:5-18.

Perret C, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Lefèvre Colau MM, Mayoux Benhamou MA, Revel M. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1566-70.

Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, Lodovichi SS, Mello W, Grossi DB. The Brazilian version of STarT Back Screening Tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(5):453-61.

Dhondt E, Van Oosterwijck J, Cagnie B, Adnan R, Schouppe S, Van Akeleyen J. Predicting treatment adherence and outcome to outpatient multimodal rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(2):277-93.

Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):920-5.

Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70.

Stevens ML, Lin CC, Hancock MJ, Wisby-Roth T, Latimer J, Maher CG. A physiotherapist-led exercise and education program for preventing recurrence of low back pain: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Physiotherapy. 2018;104(2):217-23.

Beinart NA, Goodchild CE, Weinman JA, Ayis S, Godfrey EL. Individual and intervention-related factors associated with adherence to home exercise in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013;13(12):1940-50.

Gillies K, Kearney A, Keenan C, Treweek S, Hudson J, Brueton VC. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(3):MR000032.

Sharma S, Jensen MP, Moseley GL, Abbott JH. Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e026874.

DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care;. 2004;42(3):200-9.

Boutevillain L, Dupeyron A, Rouch C, Richard E, Coudeyre E. Facilitators and barriers to physical activity in people with chronic low back pain: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0179826.

Palazzo C, Klinger E, Dorner V, Kadri A, Thierry O, Boumenir Y. Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59(2):107-13.

Carr JL, Klaber Moffett JA, Howarth E, Richmond SJ, Torgerson DJ, Jackson DA. A randomized trial comparing a group exercise programme for back pain patients with individual physiotherapy in a severely deprived area. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(16):929-37.

O’Keeffe M, Hayes A, McCreesh K, Purtill H, O’Sullivan K. Are group-based and individual physiotherapy exercise programmes equally effective for musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sport Med. 2017;51(2):126-32.

Estratégias para o cuidado da pessoa com doença crônica (Cadernos de Atenção Básica, n. 35) [Internet]. 2014.

Submetido em:
22/12/2021

Aceito em:
09/05/2022

62e05cc2a9539523175d47a3 brjp Articles
2595-3192 (Eletrônico) 2595-0118 (Impresso)
BrJP ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

BrJP

Share this page
Page Sections