Brazilian Journal of Pain
https://brjp.org.br/article/doi/10.5935/2595-0118.2023009-en
Brazilian Journal of Pain
Original Article

Comparison between Simple Planas Indirect Tracks and occlusal splints for treatment of temporomandibular disorder-related headache: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Comparação entre Pistas Indiretas Planas Simples e placas miorrelaxantes para tratamento de dor de cabeça relacionada à disfunção temporomandibular: ensaio clínico randomizado

Pedro Pileggi Vinha; Sandra N Cheriegate; Adriana B Petermann; Alexandre Kaup

Downloads: 0
Views: 289

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Temporomandibular disorder-related headache (TMDH) is a very common clinical condition which manifests as pain around the temples. The treatment recommended in dentistry is occlusal splint. However, there is a device generally used in functional jaw orthopedics, called simple Planas indirect tracks (SPIT), which has been shown to be efficient in managing these headaches. This clinical trial aimed to compare SPIT and occlusal splints in the treatment of TMDH patients. 
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included thirty-seven women who had TMDH for more than one year into three groups: GPIT treated with SPIT, GSPLINT treated with a Michigan splint, and a control group (CG) submitted to no treatment. The randomization was paired, that is, each new individual was assigned to a group sequentially. The number of headache days per month, average pain intensity, pain response to masseter and temporalis palpation, and days of pain drug use were collected and analyzed. The follow-up lasted for 3 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included but 4 dropped out during treatment and 33 underwent intervention. Patients in GPIT exhibited superior results compared to GSPLINT and CG, with significant differences between groups for almost all variables. In GPIT, the number of headache days was reduced by 87.43%, pain intensity by 66.67%, and days of drug use by 88.42%, with significant improvement in all parameters compared to CG. In GSPLINT, the number of headache days decreased by 44.46% and days of drug use by 36.63%, while pain intensity increased by 46.67%; however, there was no significant difference in any of the parameters compared to CG. 
CONCLUSION: SPIT may be a good treatment option for patients with TMDH since these appliances have shown much more consistent results than occlusal splints. Further studies and with more individuals will be needed to confirm these findings.

 

Keywords

Headache, Headache disorders, Occlusal splints, Planas Indirect Tracks, Secondary headache disorders, Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A cefaleia secundária à disfunção temporomandibular (CDTM), é uma condição clínica muito comum, com dores nas têmporas. O tratamento padrão na odontologia são as placas miorrelaxantes, entretanto um aparelho da ortopedia funcional dos maxilares, chamado de Pistas Indiretas Planas Simples (PIPS), tem se demonstrado eficiente no controle dessas cefaleias. Este estudo clínico visou comparar as PIPS com as placas miorrelaxantes, no quadro álgico de CDTM. 
MÉTODOS: Este ensaio clínico randomizado incluiu 37 mulheres portadoras de CDTM há mais de um ano, que foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em três grupos: o GPIPS, no qual as pacientes foram tratadas com PIPS, o GPLACA, com uso de placas miorrelaxantes de Michigan e o grupo controle (GC), sem qualquer tratamento. A aleatorização foi pareada, sendo que cada participante era consecutivamente alocada em um grupo diferente. Foram coletados e analisados dias de cefaleia por mês, intensidade de dores, resposta álgica à palpação de masseter e temporal, bem como os dias de uso de fármacos. O acompanhamento foi de três meses.
RESULTADOS: Das 37 pacientes iniciais, 4 desistiram do tratamento e apenas 33 foram submetidos a alguma intervenção. As pacientes do GPIPS apresentaram resultados muito superiores às do GPLACA e do GC, com diferenças significativas entre os grupos em quase todas as variáveis. No GPIPS, os dias de dor diminuíram 87,43%, a intensidade 66,67% e os dias de uso de fármacos analgésicos 88,42%, sendo estatisticamente significante a melhora em todos os parâmetros em relação ao GC. Já no GPLACA, os dias de dor diminuíram 44,46% e os dias de uso de fármacos 36,63%, mas a intensidade da dor aumentou 46,67%, porém sem diferença estatisticamente significante em nenhum parâmetro quando comparado ao GC. 
CONCLUSÃO: O uso do PIPS pode ser uma boa escolha de tratamento da CDTM, tendo apresentado resultados mais consistentes do que as placas miorrelaxantes. Mais estudos e com mais participantes são necessários para confirmar estes achados.

Palavras-chave

Cefaleia, Distúrbios de cefaleia, Distúrbios secundários de cefaleia, Pistas Indiretas Planas, Placas miorrelaxantes, Síndrome de disfunção da articulação temporomandibular.

References

1 Franco AL, Godoi DA, Castanharo SM, Camparis CM. Interação entre cefaléias e disfunção temporomandibular: uma revisão da literatura. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2008;37(4):401-6.

2 Kowacs F, Dantas D, De Macedo P, Pereira Da Silva-Néto R. Classificação Internacional das Cefaleias. 3ª ed. Editora Omnifarma LTDA; 2018.

3 Menezes MS, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KPS, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA. Correlação entre cefaléia e disfunção temporomandibular. Fisioter Pesqui. 2008;15(2):183-7.

4 Saha FJ, Pulla A, Ostermann T, Miller T, Dobos G, Cramer H. Effects of occlusal splint therapy in patients with migraine or tension-type headache and comorbid temporomandibular disorder. A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(33):e16805.

5 Harper DE, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ. Pain mechanisms and centralized pain in temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res. 2016;95(10):1102-8.

6 Ballegaard V, Thede-Schmidt-Hansen P, Svensson P, Jensen R. Are headache and temporomandibular disorders related? A blinded study. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(8):832-41.

7 Speciali JG, Dach F. Temporomandibular dysfunction and headache disorder. Headache. 2015;55 Suppl 1(S1):72-83.

8 Gonçalves DA, Bigal ME, Jales LC, Camparis CM, Speciali JG. Headache and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder: an epidemiological study. Headache. 2010;50(2):231-41.

9 Reik L, Hale M. The temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome: a frequent cause of headache. Headache. 1981;21(4):151-6.

10 Lupoli TA, Lockey RF. Temporomandibular dysfunction: an often overlooked cause of chronic headaches. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2007;99(4):314-8.

11 Paulino MR, Moreira VG, Lemos GA, Silva PLP, Bonan PRF, Batista AUD. Prevalência de sinais e sintomas de disfunção temporomandibular em estudantes pré-vestibulandos: associação de fatores emocionais, hábitos parafuncionais e impacto na qualidade de vida. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2018;23(1):173-86.

12 Wagner BA, Moreira Filho PF, Bernardo VG. Association of bruxism and anxiety symptoms among military firefighters with frequent episodic tension type headache and temporomandibular disorders. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2019;77(7):478-84.

13 Schiffman E, Haley D, Baker C, Lindgren B. Diagnostic criteria for screening headache patients for temporomandibular disorders. Headache J Head Face Pain. 1995;35(3):121-4.

14 Ashina S, Mitsikostas DD, Lee MJ, Yamani N, Wang SJ, Messina R, Ashina H, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Jensen RH, Diener HC, Lipton RB. Tension-type headache. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Mar 25;7(1):24.

15 Turkistani A, Shah A, Jose AM, Melo JP, Luenam K, Ananias P, Yaqub S, Mohammed L. Effectiveness of manual therapy and acupuncture in tension-type headache: a systematic review. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17601.

16 Speciali JG. Cefaléias. Rev Bras Med. 2006;63(Spec ISS.):6-18.

17 Ertsey C, Magyar M, Gyüre T, Balogh E, Bozsik G. Tension type headache and its treatment possibilities. Ideggyogy Sz. 2019;72(1-2):13-21.

18 Kamali F, Mohamadi M, Fakheri L, Mohammadnejad F. Dry needling versus friction massage to treat tension type headache: A randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(1):89-93.

19 Biondi DM. Cervicogenic headache: a review of diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(4 Suppl 2):16S-22S.

20 Krymchantowski AV. Tensionðtype headaches. Rev Bras Neurol. 2003;39(4):23-9.

21 Álvarez-Melcón AC, Valero-Alcaide R, Atín-Arratibel MA, Melcón-Álvarez A, Beneit-Montesinos JV. Effects of physical therapy and relaxation techniques on the parameters of pain in university students with tension-type headache: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Neurol (English Ed. 2018;33(4):233-43.

22 Kostrzewa-Janicka J, Mierzwinska-Nastalska E, Rolski D, Szczyrek P. Occlusal stabilization splint therapy in orofacial pain and tension-type headache. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;788:181-8.

23 Troeltzsch M, Messlinger K, Brodine B, Gassling V, Troeltzsch M. A comparison of conservative and invasive dental approaches in the treatment of tension-type headache. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(9):795-802.

24 Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Winocur E, Lobbezoo F. Management of sleep bruxism in adults: a qualitative systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(11):862-74.

25 Planas P, Eiras H. Reabilitação Neuro-Oclusal. 2ª ed. Guanabara-Koogan, ed. MEDSI; 1997.

26 Riley P, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, Jacobsen E, Robertson C, Durham J, Davies S, Petersen H, Boyers D. Oral splints for patients with temporomandibular disorders or bruxism: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Feb;24(7):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta24070. PMID: 32065109; PMCID: PMC7049908.
 


Submitted date:
03/15/2023

Accepted date:
05/05/2023

65173baea95395401f2d8473 brjp Articles

BrJP

Share this page
Page Sections