Brazilian Journal of Pain
https://brjp.org.br/article/doi/10.5935/2595-0118.20200180
Brazilian Journal of Pain
Original Article

Cross-cultural adaptation and content validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Nociception Coma Scale-revised

Adaptação transcultural e evidência de validade de conteúdo da versão brasileira da Nociception Coma Scale-revised

Mariana Bucci Sanches; Cristiane Vias França Silva; Yasmin Mohamed Ali; Marcio Matsumoto; João Valverde Filho; Marina de Góes Salvetti

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20200180 BrJP, vol.3, n3, p.253-257, 2020
PDF English
PDF Português
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 394

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are communication barriers to assess pain in patients with consciousness and cognitive disorders. This study aimed to make the cross-cultural adaptation of the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) to the Portuguese language and check the validation evidence of the content of the NCR-R Brazilian version in non-communicative patients with consciousness and cognitive disorders.

METHODS: This is a methodological study to check the cross-cultural adaptation of the NCR-R, divided into two stages: cross-cultural adaptation and check of the content validity. The cross-cultural adaptation phase included an initial translation, synthesis of translations, back-translation, expert committee, and cognitive debriefing based on Beaton and Price. A second expert committee evaluated the translated and adapted version to check the content validity index.

RESULTS: The NCS-R scale was translated and cross-culturally adapted, presenting good evidence of content validity with a Content Validity Index of 0.86.

CONCLUSION: The NCS-R is translated and transculturally adapted and has good evidence of content validity.

Keywords

Consciousness disorders, Pain, Psychometrics, Nursing assessment, Validation studies

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Em pacientes com desordens de consciência e distúrbios cognitivos há barreiras de comunicação para a avaliação da dor. O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar a adaptação transcultural da Nociception Coma Scale-revised (NCS-R) para a língua portuguesa e verificar as evidências de validade de conteúdo da versão brasileira da NCS-R em pacientes não comunicativos com desordens de consciência e distúrbios cognitivos.

MÉTODOS: Estudo metodológico para adaptação transcultural da NCS-R dividido em duas etapas: adaptação transcultural e verificação da validade de conteúdo. A fase de adaptação transcultural incluiu a tradução inicial, síntese das traduções, retrotradução, comitê de especialista e debriefing cognitivo baseado em Beaton e Price. A versão traduzida e adaptada foi avaliada por um segundo comitê de especialistas para a avaliação do índice de validade de conteúdo.

RESULTADOS: A NCS-R foi traduzida, adaptada do ponto de vista transcultural e apresentou boa evidência de validade de conteúdo com Índice de Validade de Conteúdo de 0,86.

CONCLUSÃO: A NCS-R encontra-se traduzida e adaptada do ponto de vista transcultural, e possui boa evidência de validade de conteúdo.

Palavras-chave

Avaliação em enfermagem, Dor, Estudos de validação, Psicometria, Transtornos da consciência

References

Aydede M. Does the IASP definition of pain need updating. Pain Rep. 2019;4(5).

Kawagoe CK, Matuoka JY, Salvetti MG. Instrumentos de avaliação da dor em pacientes críticos com dificuldade de comunicação verbal: revisão de escopo. Rev Dor. 2017;18(2):161-5.

Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Majerus S, Ledoux D, Boly M. The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain. 2010;148(2):215-9.

Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Rolf-Detlef T, Jon-Kar Z. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(4):463-84.

Classification of chronic pain (Revised). 2011.

Schnakers C, Zasler N. Assessment and management of pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. PM R. 2015;7(11 Suppl):S270-7.

Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P, Damas P, Lambermont B, Del Fiore G. Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):732-41.

Wade DT. How often is the diagnosis of the permanent vegetative state incorrect: A review of the evidence. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(4):619-25.

Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Majerus S, Gosseries O, De Val M, Laureys S. Assessment and detection of pain in noncommunicative severely brain-injured patients. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10(11):1725-31.

Chatelle C, Majerus S, Whyte J, Laureys S, Schnakers C. A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(12):1233-7.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.

Price VE, Klaassen RJ, Bolton-Maggs PH, Grainger JD, Curtis C, Wakefield C. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in rare populations: a practical approach to cross-cultural translation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:92.

Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435-41.

Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1-9.

Vink P, Lucas C, Maaskant JM, van Erp WS, Lindeboom R, Vermeulen H. Clinimetric properties of the Nociception Coma Scale (-Revised): A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(9):1463-74.

Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16(7):3061-8.

Chatelle C, Laureys S, Demertzi A. Pain and nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain and the conscious brain. 2016.

Bernard C, Delmas V, Duflos C, Molinari N, Garnier O, Chalard K. Assessing pain in critically ill brain-injured patients: a psychometric comparison of 3 pain scales and videopupillometry. Pain. 2019;160(11):2535-43.

Fava GA, Tomba E, Sonino N. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):11-5.

Submitted date:
04/24/2020

Accepted date:
05/29/2020

5f6a57fa0e8825a10b9fefc7 brjp Articles
2595-3192 (Electronic) 2595-0118 (Printed)
BrJP ©2024 All rights reserved.

BrJP

Share this page
Page Sections